REVIEW OF
THE PEARCE-PRATT DISTANCE SERIES OF ESP TESTS
By J.B. Rhine and J.G.
Pratt
A number of considerations have contributed to
our decision to present the original and subsequent work
identified with what has come to be known as the Pearce-Pratt
Distance Series of ESP tests, carried out in 1933-34 at the
Parapsychology Laboratory at Duke University. One reason for the
review is the need expressed by some students of the subject for
a more complete and detailed account of the original experiment
than is to be found in any one publication.
The first part of the series, what is known as Subseries A,
was published in the monograph Extrasensory Perception written
in 1934 by J.B.Rhine. This section was all that was completed at
the time the monograph was written. In 1936 a brief account of
the series and its total results was given in an article by J.B.
Rhine in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
and in 1937 a condensed version of this article was included in
the first number of the Journal of Parapsychology.
Another reason for the present undertaking is the fact that
almost immediately upon publication, the Pearce-Pratt Series
received special attention. It represented a methodological
advance over earlier experimental work in parapsychology; and
both for the laboratory group associated with the experiment and
for those who were attempting to appraise and criticize the
evidence for extrasensory perception, the series had to be
considered.
Moreover, as new questions were raised about the series,
further analysis of the data resulted. Most of these analyses
were reported as they were completed, but to the student of
today it would be a difficult undertaking to run them all
down.
There is the further point that it is now possible to
appraise the experiment and its results in the light of the
developments of the intervening twenty years, the most
productive period of parapsychology. It was considered an
advantage to older students as well as new, therefore, for the
authors to assemble for re-examination the factual matter that
has accumulated around this single experimental series.
Something should be said regarding the general background of
the research. First, there is the all- important aspect of
personnel. It should not be forgotten that without Prof. William
McDougall's appreciation of the problem and his tolerant and
courageous interest in seeing it investigated under good
conditions in a psychology laboratory, the experiment would not
have been possible.
J.B. Rhine was at the time an assistant professor in the
department of which Professor McDougall was head; it was
generally understood in those days that research in
parapsychology was approved by the Department. J.G. Pratt was a
graduate student in psychology, especially employed as research
assistant to J.B. Rhine. From the viewpoint of objectivity, it
should be noted that J.G. Pratt had not at that time shown
special interest in the problems of parapsychology, and in fact
worked on other problems for his graduate researches. It was not
until some years later that he decided to devote his other
problems for his graduate researches.
The subject, Hubert E. Pearce, Jr., was at the time a student
in the Divinity School at Duke. He had introduced himself to J.B.
Rhine approximately eighteen months earlier and had stated that
he believed he had inherited his mother's clairvoyant powers. In
ESP card tests given by J.G. Pratt and J.B. Rhine during the
intervening period he had exceeded the average score to be
expected from chance in practically every experimental session
under a wide variety of conditions.
During that period he had participated in tests involving
nearly 700 runs through the standard deck of ESP cards,
averaging approximately 32% successes as compared with the mean
chance expectation of 20%. Nothing like this prolonged series of
tests had ever been made up to that time, and Hubert Pearce's
performance was recognized even then as highly exceptional.
The Distance Series was the first step involving different
buildings in the separation of Hubert Pearce from the target
card he was attempting to identify. The move was not so much a
strictly necessary requirement for the exclusion of visual cues
as it was a matter of providing a conspicuously wide margin of
safety against the possibility of such cues. The use of
different buildings, incidentally, was convenient for the
independent recording of the subject's responses and the card
sequences. It became easily possible at the same time to provide
for duplicate recording and independent checking.
To those of us who had participated in the long series of
earlier tests with Hubert Pearce under gradually improving
conditions of test and observation, this further advance in
experimental conditions was hardly required. The essential
safeguards had already been approximated. advance in
experimental conditions was hardly required.
The essential safeguards had already been approximated. There
is, however, a tendency of the mind, when confronted with so
incredible a hypothesis as that of ESP, to exaggerate the
possibility of alternative factors such as visual cues,
recording errors, the loss of records, and the like.
The revolutionary character of the ESP hypothesis, then, made
necessary a range of precautions that were not normally
considered a part of the routine of experimental psychology.
This atmosphere of critical apprehension concerning the adequacy
of the design needs to be taken into account, for it was part of
the actual situation in which the experiment was conducted.
Some idea of the state of mind prevailing at the time can be
gained from the circumstances leading to the planning of
Subseries D. Subseries A, B, and C had been designed on the
assumption that no error was possible that could favor in the
ESP hypothesis - not unless the two designed on the assumption
that no error was possible that could favor in the ESP
hypothesis - not unless the two men, J.G. Pratt and Hubert
Pearce were deliberately to conspire to produce a fraudulent set
of results.
Wisely (and accurately) anticipating that there would be
those who would find it easier to suspect collusion than to
accept ESP as established, Professor McDougall recommended that
J.B. Rhine identify himself with the actual performance of at
least a short subseries of the distance tests in order that a
theory of collusion would have to involve all three of the
participants in the experiment. On the basis of this plan
Subseries D was conducted with J.B. Rhine actively officiating
with J.G. Pratt.
Actually the primary research objective in the experiment was
to compare the effect of short and long distance on the results.
In the planning of the test series, this concern with the role
of distance was the essentially novel feature of the
experimental design. In most of the tests in which J.G. Pratt
took part during the preceding period, the target cards had been
within a yard of him. It was considered a sufficient first step
to introduce a distance of at least a hundred times that unit as
one that should reveal any effect of distance on any possible
radiant energy that conceivably intermediated in the operation
of ESP.
Later in the series this distance was increased still
farther. While, then, for the general public and the critic
especially, the Pearce-Pratt Series came into focus as a
conclusive demonstration of the occurrence of ESP, to the
workers in the Parapsychology Laboratory it became the first
definite step in the testing of the hypothesis of the
non-physical nature of psi, the hypothesis suggested by earlier
experimental work as well as by the study of spontaneous psi
experiences.
PROCEDURE:
A single subject, Hubert Pearce, was tested for his ability
to identify ESP test cards manipulated by the experimental
assistant, J.G. Pratt, in another building, part of the time at
a distance of 100 yards and part of the time at a distance of
more than 250 yards from the location of the subject. The
experiment was designed to test for the clairvoyant type of ESP;
and J.G. Pratt, accordingly, did not know the card order in the
test.
Aside from planning the experiment, J.B. Rhine participated
only in the independent checking of the results, except for
Series D in which he participated with J.G. Pratt as the witness
to the operation of the test.
There were, in all, four subseries, A, B, C, and D, totaling
74 runs through the pack of 25 cards; and the series extended
from August, 1933 into March, 1934. The testing days were not
consecutive, though within a given series extended from August,
1933 into March, 1934. The testing days were not consecutive,
though within a given subseries they were more or less so. They
were selected, however, at the mutual convenience of Hubert
Pearce and J.G. Pratt. Subseries C was begun in October, 1933,
and four runs were added to it in March, 1934, with Subseries D
following thereafter. Specific dates may be found in Table 1.
Subseries A was done with the 100 yards distance. Subseries B
at 250 yards, and the other two subseries back at 100 yards. The
74 runs represent all the ESP tests made with Hubert Pearce
during this experiment under the condition of working with the
subject and target cards in different buildings. It was, in
fact, the only distance test involving different buildings done
at the Duke Laboratory at the time.
Series A was set up with an advance commitment on termination
point. It was agreed that 300 trials were to be given Hubert
Pearce. The following Subseries, B, was intended to be a
duplication with only the additional distance involved, but the
experimenters were interested in the big shift of scoring level
from day to day which was shown at the longer distance.
It was decided to allow Hubert Pearce to continue further so
as to see what would happen. Subseries C was intended to be a
repetition of Subseries A consisting of 300 trials designed to
discover whether the lower scoring rate of Subseries B at the
longer distance was a result of the altered situation or whether
Hubert Pearce had declined in scoring ability. Subseries D, as
has been stated, was intended as introducing a check on J.G.
Pratt, and its length was agreed upon in advance (150 trials, or
six runs).
In actual operation the experiment proceeded as follows,
regardless of which subseries was involved: At the time agreed
upon, Hubert Pearce visited J.G. Pratt in his research room on
the top floor of what is now the Social Science Building on the
main Duke campus. The two men synchronized their watch and set
an exact time for starting the test, allowing enough time for
Hubert Pearce to cross the quadrangle to the Duke Library where
he occupied a cubicle in the stacks at the back of the building.
From his window J.G. Pratt could see Hubert Pearce enter the
Library.
J.G. Pratt then selected a pack of ESP cards from several
packs always available in the room. He gave this pack of cards a
number of dovetail shuffles and a final cut, keeping them
face-down throughout. He then placed the pack on the right-hand
side of the table at which he was sitting. In the center of the
table was a closed book on which it had been agreed with Hubert
Pearce that the card for each trial would be placed.
At the minute set for starting the test, J.G. Pratt lifted
the top card from the inverted deck, placed it face-down on the
book, and allowed it to remain there for approximately a full
minute. At the beginning of the next minute this card was picked
up with the left hand and laid, still face-down, on the
left-hand side of the table, while with the right hand J.G.
Pratt picked up the next card and put it on the book.
At the end of the second minute, this card was placed on top
of the one on the left and the next one was put on the book. In
this way, at the rate of one card per minute, the entire pack of
25 cards went through the process of being isolated, one card at
a time, on the book in the center of the table, where it was the
target or stimulus object for that ESP trial.
In his cubicle in the Library, Hubert Pearce attempted to
identify the target cards, minute by minute, and recorded his
responses in pencil. At the end of the run, there was on most
test days a rest period of five minutes before a second run
followed in exactlythe same way. Hubert Pearce made a duplicate
of his call record, signed one copy, and sealed it in an
envelope for J.B. Rhine.
Over in his room J.G. Pratt recorded the card order for the
two decks used in the test as soon as the second run was
finished. This record, too, was in duplicate, one copy of which
was signed and sealed in an envelope for J.B. Rhine. The two
sealed records were delivered personally to J.B. Rhine, most of
the time before J.G. Pratt and Hubert Pearce compared their
records and scored the number of successes.
On the few occasions when J.G. Pratt and Hubert Pearce met
and compared their unsealed duplicates before both of them had
delivered their sealed records to J.B. Rhine, the data could not
have been changed without collusion, as J.G. Pratt kept the
result from the unsealed records and any discrepancy between
them and J.B. Rhine's results would have been noticed. In
Subseries D, J.B. Rhine was on hand to receive the duplicates as
the two other men met immediately after each session for the
checkup.
Thus, from day to day as the experiment proceeded, Hubert
Pearce was kept informed, as he had been in all his earlier
experiments, as to the rate of success achieved. The practice of
expressing enthusiastic congratulations should be mentioned as a
part of the procedure. If, as rarely happened, the scoring rate
was low, favorable emphasis was placed on the overall
performance, the general average maintained, and the high
standing of the subject in the comparative scale of ESP
subjects. Throughout the series the paramount objective of
high-order performance was held before the subject with all the
vigor and expectation that could be communicated.
RESULTS
General Evaluation
Since they were one series of tests carried out under
essentially the same conditions, the four subseries (totaling 74
runs, or 1850 trials) may be pooled. Mean chance expectation is
20%, or 370 hits. The total number of successes actually scored
for the series is 558, which is better than 30%. The theoretical
standard deviation derived on a conservative basis is 17.57.
This total of 558 hits is 188 above the theoretical expectation
and it gives a crit ical ratio of 10.70. The probability that a
critical ratio so large as this would occur on the basis of
random sampling is less than 10-22.
In the determination of the critical ratio
given above, allowance is made for the slight correction
applicable when, as in this experiment, the balanced ESP is
used; thatis, when there are five of each symbol in each pack.
The variance of scores obtained with the 5 X 5 ESP deck depends
upon the frequency with which the subject calls the different
symbols. The largest variance results when the subject always
calls exactly five of each symbol, and the standard deviation of
17.57 was obtained on this assumption.
However, the subject rarely called five of each symbol in a
run, and the exact standard deviation would therefore be smaller
than the one used here, which makes the estimate of statistical
significance a conservative one.
Sub-series
Start
Dates End
Runs
Dev.
SD
CR
P
A
8/25/33
9/01/33
12
+59
7.07
8.35
<10-22
B
9/02/33
9/30/33
44
+75
13.54
5.54
<10-6
C
10/18/33
3/10/34
12
+28
7.07
3.96
.000075
D
3/12/34
3/13/34
6
+26
5.00
5.20
<10-6
TOTAL
8/25/33
3/13/34
74
+188
17.57
10.70
<10-22
Each of the four subseries is independently
significant, as may be seen by reference to Table 1. The Table
shows for each subseries the date, number of runs, deviation,
standard deviation, critical ratio, and the asssociated
probability. A complete record of the card order and calls for
the series has been furnished from time to time to qualified
workers who wish to make some special study of the material.
This practice will continue.